New Zealand becomes first country to specifically warn against low carb, paleo and intermittent fasting

MoH topical q and A

Yes true, New Zealand released its new nutrition guidelines late last year.

No real surprises in them.  Little improvement over the old ones really, as well as a few interesting things like the “four food groups“. In case you are wondering, these are vegetables and fruit, grains (at least 6 servings a day), low fat dairy, and (some) lean sources of protein like nuts, fish, legumes etc.

They do now have an emphasis on whole, unprocessed foods, and do have a statement about limiting alcohol, which are both commendable.  They also say that fat is important. But in every part of the detail it’s all about low fat and high carb. They also have a section on “Making Healthier Food Choices”  which starts well by talking about unprocessed foods, but deteriorates into food labels and the Health Star rating system – which basically endorses processed foods.

Here’s a list of how to make healthier choices. It gives you an idea of where this is all going.

Instead of this Use this
Butter Margarine or other plant-based unsaturated spreads
Lard and/or dripping Water (for roasting meat), small amount of plant-based unsaturated oils (see below)
Coconut oil Small amount of plant-based unsaturated oils, eg, canola, olive, sunflower or rice bran oils
Full-fat milk Low- and reduced-fat milk
High-fat cheese, eg, mild, Colby Reduced-fat cheese, eg, edam
Coconut cream ‘Lite’ coconut cream or milk, or use half water and half coconut cream
White bread Higher fibre, dense whole grain bread
High-fat takeaways Healthier option takeaways, eg, kebabs or wraps with plenty of salad, non-fried Asian rice or noodle dishes with plenty of vegetables
Sugar-coated breakfast cereal Whole grain cereal, eg, porridge or whole wheat breakfast biscuits
Muesli bars Fresh fruit or a small handful of unsalted nuts
Chippies and a cream-based dip Raw vegetable sticks and hummus, or homemade popcorn (go easy on the salt)
Sugary drinks Water. It is nice chilled, with fresh mint and/ or a slice of lemon
Fruit juice Glass of chilled water and a piece of fruit
Dried fruit Fresh fruit

I’ve writen about this before, and we’ve sent in detailed scientfic and public health rationale for moving away from the current approach (MOH dietary guidelines feedback REVISED Appendix 9.5.14). We even suggested the real food guidelines – a set of public health nutrition guidelines which we think are much more sensible given the state of scientific evidence such that it is. The main idea being that there is an emphasis on eating real, whole food and forgetting about the emphasis on the mythical whole grain, the demonising of saturated fat, and low fat high carbohydrate in general.

But here’s the bit we found most objectionable

MoH topical q and A

“This resource provides answers on some topical issues around eating (nutrition) and physical activity. The responses are based on the Ministry of Health’s monitoring of international research. Any new research is considered alongside the existing body of evidence and best international population health advice.”

Here are the first few topics…judge for yourself

Sat fatFoods high in saturated fat include butter, cream, cheese and the fat from meat as well as coconut oil and palm oil. The link between saturated fat consumption, blood cholesterol levels and heart disease is well established, with evidence building over the past 60 years. Recent comments, highlighted in the media, have promoted high saturated-fat diets. These comments oppose widely held nutritional understanding of a healthy diet.

The current body of evidence supports replacing saturated fats with polyunsaturated fats, to reduce the risk of heart disease and stroke. In practice, this means using unsaturated fats such as plant-based oils and spreads instead of butter if needed for cooking and spreading. The few recent studies that endorse high saturated-fat diets are not sufficient to refute the existing body of evidence.

Really?

My verdict: This single issue is the one which makes it so hard for these people to move on to a more sensible set of public health nutrition guidelines. Decades poor research and poor interpretation of meta-analyses have lead the “old boys” into cognitive dissonance that means they will never change their minds. The public is now more savvy and is likely to realise that this is just silly. Recent sales of butter (up) and margarine (down and Unilever is thinking about abandoning its manufacture) are good evidence of this.

LCHF MoHLow-carb, high-fat diets are sometimes promoted as a better way of losing weight than diets that contain more moderate and balanced amounts of carbohydrate and fat.

However, it is not the proportions of macronutrients (carbohydrate, fat and proteins) that affect weight loss but the total energy in the diet. While people can lose weight with some low-carb, high-fat diets, this happens with other energy-controlled eating plans as well. Importantly, there is no evidence of the long-term benefits or safety of such diets. Based on all the current evidence, the Ministry of Health does not recommend low-carb, high-fat diets for weight loss.

Really?

My verdict: For goodness sake, have a look at the scientific evidence. We know that these diets work well for weight loss, especially for those people who are insulin resistant.

PaleoThe ‘paleo’ or palaeolithic diet is an eating pattern claimed to be based on the diet of early ‘hunter-gatherer’ humans from the Palaeolithic period (around 2.5 million to 10,000 years BC). The diet consistsof vegetables, some fruit, nuts, naturally occurring fats and oils, meat and seafood. It excludes dairy products, grains, legumes, processed oils, sugar, salt, alcohol and coffee. The premise for the diet is that modern humans remain genetically adapted to the eating patterns of their ancestors, and so this continues to be the optimal way to eat for health.

Although the paleo diet includes many healthy foods, it is also linked to a number of issues. In particular, copying a ‘true’ Palaeolithic diet is difficult as very little is known about the diet of these early people and many of the specific plant and animal foods around during the Palaeolithic period no longer exist. Also, significantly, the diet excludes entire food groups that are important to healthy eating patterns. Examples are grains, legumes and dairy products.

Yes, New Zealand nutrition recommendations specifically go out of their way to tell people who have a template of eating that is based on whole unprocessed foods – those humans mostly ate for almost all of their evolutionary history – that this is not healthy and you shouldn’t do it!

My verdict: This is an embarrassment.

IF MoH

The little research available on intermittent fasting diets in humans has shown people can lose weight following this eating plan. Perhaps the best-known version of intermittent fasting is the 5-2 diet, where a person has five days of ‘normal’ eating and two days of a much lower energy intake (approximately 2100–2500 kilojoules per day, which is 25 percent of requirements). Over time, it reduces total energy (kilojoules) intake, which is the likely cause of the weight loss.

At present, no studies have shown how sustainable this eating pattern is or how it impacts on long-term weight or health outcomes. Possible immediate side effects from the ‘fasting days’ are extreme hunger, low energy levels, light-headedness and poor mental functioning. The quality of the diet on ‘normal’ days will also impact on health outcomes in the long term.

The 5-2 diet is not recommended for people with insulin dependent diabetes.

OK, because people with insulin couldn’t figure out how to adjust their insulin and this will drive hypoglycaemia? I assume everyone else can do intermittent fasting though by only selecting this group, cool.

My verdict: Yes more research needs to be done with fasting, but it could be really useful for people who are metabolically dysregulated and could even help some Type 2 diabetics who are dependent on insulin get off insulin. Why is this diet (one which doesn’t even restrict “food groups”) chosen as a target over the dozens and dozens of really silly ones out in the public space?

Fruit MoHRecommendations to decrease sugar intake refer specifically to ‘free sugars’. Free sugars include all sugar added to foods as well as sugars that are naturally present in fruit juice, syrups and honey. This recommendation does not apply to the sugar that is found naturally in the structure of foods such as whole fruit and dairy products.

As well as sugar, whole fruit provide a range of nutrients including dietary fibre and phytonutrients (beneficial chemicals found in plants). Fruit along with a range of other foods is part of a healthy eating pattern.

Specifically what nutrients will people eating a whole food diet without fruit miss out on? So if your blood sugar is raised by eating fruit, especially high sugar fruits like grapes and bananas then thats OK – especially if you are insulin resistant and this provokes hyperinsulinemia?

My verdict: There is a widespread belief that unlimited fruit is OK no matter how poorly you can control your blood sugar and insulin. This belief is rubbish.  Limiting fruit is a good option for people in this category.

There you go. New Zealand – the first country in the word to give women the vote, a country that prides itself as early adopters and innovators, is again first! We’ve warned people off low carb and paleo. That’s a shame really because these are two of the most promising ways to help fix the current metabolic diseases that affect our quality and quantity of life, and cost us billions of dollars.

 

25 comments

  1. Love this comment about paleo: “It is not a healthy eating plan,” followed by their description of paleo: “The diet consists of vegetables, some fruit, nuts, naturally occurring fats and oils, meat and seafood. It excludes dairy products, grains, legumes, processed oils, sugar, salt, alcohol and coffee.”

    Righto – I see their point. All that simple, wholefood sounds positively deadly.

    Good lord – are the MOH trying to kill us all?

    1. Kathy Anderson · · Reply

      I think that is such a pertinent question……is there genuinely an element that having sick people creates lots of business opportunity. Certainly we are all aware of the hold pharmaceutical companies have on modern capitalist economies. Couple that with the fact that many universities are funded by them and therefore have control over a lot of what is taught, it’s not hard to see a link that perhaps there would be too much to lose by having an empowered healthy population.
      Maybe I am too cynical?

  2. Holy crap dude, you got it sooooo wrong. No wonder people are filling the hospitals.

    1. brainunwashed · · Reply

      WHO got “it” wrong………dude (from 1960s America)

  3. Kathy Anderson · · Reply

    Gosh….I feel your pain…..definitely embarrassing….especially comments such as “not enough long term evidence”…….when there is plenty long term evidence that the low fat high carb. diets are not working!

    Not too surprising though really, as an outsider I have been disappointed with NZ’s lack of progressiveness. I think it may have run out of steam shortly after giving women the vote!

    A resourceful country with a tiny population should be the model of exemplary behaviours, with lots of scope for experiment and exploration, instead it wallows in UK/US style fat cat style management.

    Still, as long as people are online and active on social media, the message is getting out about the dangers of all types of sugar and the trend will continue. I am sure you guys will not lose your passion and enthusiasm and the growing number of people who have switched eating habits will be the healthy proof that there is a lot more to eating than the total number of calories consumed.

    1. Just found this; another interesting article from a UK doctor.
      Good to see so many positive results on a spectrum of health issues.
      http://drmarkporter.co.uk/low-carb-diet-my-6-week-experiment-to-see-how-cutting-back-on-carbs-impacted-on-my-blood-cholesterol-lipid-profile/

  4. trekkiemaiden · · Reply

    Just appaling!! I’m gutted – how much of a step in the wrong direction is that advice!! Idiots. There really should be an “I don’t like” button for this. Guys – help support our Public Health Collaboration – with Sam Feltham and Dr Aseem Malhotra, here in the Uk to get the Gvt listening – it’s at the crowdfunding stage so please go to https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/public-health-collaboration/x/13319911#/

    If we can get one gvt to listen then the others should follow…….

  5. robert lipp · · Reply

    This is a Swedish diabetes doctor site that disagrees. Sweden’s government disagrees after reviewing 16000 (that is correct 16000) research articles.
    http://www.dietdoctor.com/the-future-is-lower-carb-higher-fat?utm_source=Diet+Doctor+Newsletter&utm_campaign=46d138734c-Test&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_41db911777-46d138734c-463339501

  6. Ursula McEntee · · Reply

    Obviously they don’t read world wide research in NZ. Bless them!

  7. 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines: “A number of established food, diet and health relationships covered in the 2003 edition, where the evidence base was unlikely to have changed substantially, were identified as not needing specific search questions to be asked. For example, the relationship between diets high in saturated fat and increased risk of high serum cholesterol. “

    So this document was over 200 pages long and had 1128 references and they didn’t bother with checking recent refs about saturated fat because they ‘know’ it is bad.

    1. trekkiemaiden · · Reply

      “A high-fat, high-saturated fat diet decreases insulin sensitivity without changing intra-abdominal fat in weight-stable overweight and obese adults”

      The conclusion states:

      A diet very high in fat and saturated fat adversely affects insulin sensitivity and thereby might contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes.

      Still too many carbs – at 27% – thats over a quarter of the content of the high fat diet the subjects were told to eat. HFHC is not a good idea either.

  8. robert lipp · · Reply

    Butter sales are rising – inspite of new Zealand’s nonsense – and fake butter (aka margarine) sales are falling. Maybe new Zealand needs to keep up to date – as the people are reading and walking the talk. Unilever one of the biggest fake butter factories is isolating its business – perhaps in anticipation of class actions. Question: why eat an un-natural fake product that your body is not designed by evolution to process when there is butter???
    http://www.dietdoctor.com/the-great-butter-revival-is-killing-margarine

  9. Eat butter, coconut oil, not fake stupid dumb yucky margarine, i love butter its true makes you feel great, i remember wen I was 8 (1978) we had nice skin teeth, hair, was skinny as, cause we ate butter and drank yummy cream, ate cheese and NZ real meat grass fed cooked in yummy dripping…..until them dumb as McD’s moved in we got freakn FAT cause they cooked our food in vegetable oil, canola oil FAKE OILS that made us FAT…….EAT NZ BUTTER….EAT NZ MEAT nice real foods….. not dumb grain fed meat fake meat makes us fat

  10. Very informative.
    Thanks.

  11. the long term evidence lies in the fact that people survived the paleolithic area and made it over the centuries to industrialization, and from that time on humans will soon extinguish due to food foreign to human species.
    Why are they advice such crap? the industry will loose billions and billions if people would eat natural food, they cannot sell their wheat, their burgers, their medication, their insulin, their skin products, their packages (no plastic anymore) and their commercials and ads, their research sponsored by xy and it goes on and on. It is a big conspiracy! Eat recognizable food that come without a long ingredient list and much package and you are fine! it is that simple!

  12. “There is a widespread belief that unlimited fruit is OK no matter how poorly you can control your blood sugar and insulin. This belief is rubbish. Limiting fruit is a good option for people in this category.”

    Sorry mate but I don’t know what science you’re reading…
    Fruit improves blood sugar control.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21621801
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22354959
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365108
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497350
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20564476
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15757656
    http://jn.nutrition.org/content/138/3/439/F2.expansion.html
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16548015
    http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/96/3/527.long
    http://jn.nutrition.org/content/140/10/1764.full

    Animal products are what should be avoided with diabetics(and people in general) as they produce a massive spike with carbs
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2679037
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6389060

    Saturated fat and cholesterol are associated with heart disease. The controversy can easily be explained. Its a cutthroat world and people like to hear good things about their bad habits. It makes for easy book sales and increases animal product profits.
    https://www.cspinet.org/nah/pdfs/covermay2014.pdf
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/313701

    If dietary saturated fat and cholesterol didn’t raise serum cholesterol levels, then explain why vegans and vegetarians have lower cholesterol.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26508743
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17364116
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7019459
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349038/
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24963684

    Thank you!

    1. Yes fructose in fruit is better than sugar and fructose not in fruit….but it still raises blood sugar more than eating a low sugar vegetable. So you have not be careful of not doing what you are accusing me of?
      Yes eating fat raises cholesterol but how does that cause heart disease? It reduces risk by reducing ApoB and increaisng HDL. Your A causes B and B causes C so A causes B argument doesn’t cut it.
      I do agree that adding fat to carbs in insulin resistant people causes insulin spikes – so don’t eat the carbs they are not essential whereas the fat and protein are?

      1. I see your logic. However, when we look at the blue zones, the longest living populations, they all eat a diet focused around whole plant based food. Which is by default high in carbs, low in fat and adequate protein. The Okinawa’s for example (before they adopted a western diet) had a diet of 85% carbs 9% protein and 6% fat. The longest living population recorded to date are the Californian seventh day Adventist who are one step further, vegan.
        I haven’t come across any populations doing well on a LCHF diet interms of longevity and health long term. Is there any research?
        I’d say don’t eat animal products as they are not essential and keep to whole plant based foods. Provided you take a b12 supplement as the water we drink now is treated and void of b12.
        Whole foods such as fruit, beans and lentils are great for improving Insulin Sensitivity even though they are high in carbs and we actually have evidence eating this way provides great health long term.
        I’d be happy to switch to LCHF if some one could show me some research.
        I agree with the paleo diet, in that the first foods we ate were whole plant foods. I don’t agree with animal products.

        http://www.okicent.org/docs/anyas_cr_diet_2007_1114_434s.pdf

        Thanks again.

  13. Hi James,

    perhaps it’s necessary to define “fruit” and provide a little context. To people on low-carb or sugar free diets, fruit just means sweet fruit. Apple, orange, banana, pineapple, grape, sultana, dates.
    It doesn’t include other fruits – avocado, courgette, capsicum, tomato, berries, capers and so on.
    Just out of curiosity, and because I love courgettes (zucchinis to our US readers), I ran a nutrition comparison of a zucchini vs an apple through an online calculator.

    https://www.healthaliciousness.com/nutritionfacts/nutrition-comparison.php?o=11477&t=09003&h=&s=&e=&r=

    The zucchini compares very favourably with the apple. But it has less sugar – 10g less per 100g.

    Absolutely, for people who aren’t looking to make major changes to their diets, replacing sweet treats with fruit is a good idea. That doesn’t mean that replacing sweet treats and sweet fruit with low-sugar fruit isn’t a better idea. One of the studies you cited relates to blueberries, a low-sugar fruit, but they only fed the purified polyphenols to the subjects.

    In the first study you linked regarding “Animal products are what should be avoided with diabetics(and people in general) as they produce a massive spike with carbs” the fat and protein added to the carb meal was in fact additional calories, the carb meal was 100 calories and the mixed meal was 425 calories – the effect of adding protein and fat has to be seen in this light. It actually lessened the glucose spike but raised insulin more. But I cannot access the full-text to this study, and the abstract doesn’t mention that the fat and protein were animal products. Do you know what the sources of fat and protein were?

    The protein source was “lean hamburger” in the second study, in which “protein given with glucose will increase insulin secretion and reduce the plasma glucose rise in at least some type II diabetic persons.”

    Our message here is in large part about avoiding glucose except in small amounts in high-quality foods, and tailoring the amount of glucose or other sugars you consume to your personal tolerance to avoid both glucose and insulin spikes.

    This second paper is first-authored by Frank Q Nuttall and I recommend other more recent studies by this author into the metabolic benefits of carbohydrate restriction, for example

    Control of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes without weight loss by modification of diet composition

    http://nutritionandmetabolism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-7075-3-16

    You should compare the effects of glucose plus protein (a low fat meal) in diabetes with the effects of an equal amount of energy from fat plus protein. There will be a lower insulin demand and secretion and a lower glucose spike, of course. Whether the protein is animal, vegetable, or mineral won’t matter much.

    Vegans do generally have lower cholesterol; however the few vegans I know cook with coconut oil.
    However, in the Framingham study, people with the highest LDL cholesterol had a significantly reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to people with low LDL.

    “In multivariable models, a higher LDL-C concentration was associated with lower risk of diabetes (OR per SD increment 0.81, 95% CI 0.70, 0.93, p = 0.004). The GRS was associated with incident diabetes in a similar direction and of comparable magnitude (OR per SD increment 0.85, 95% CI 0.76, 0.96, p = 0.009).”

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26409460

    In the recent Malmo Diet and Cancer Study, people with the highest intake of saturated fat from dairy had a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Lean meat was associated with diabetes, but fatty red meat wasn’t.

    “Total intake of high-fat dairy products (regular-fat alternatives) was inversely associated with incident T2D (HR for highest compared with lowest quintiles: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.87; P-trend < 0.001). Most robust inverse associations were seen for intakes of cream and high-fat fermented milk (P-trend < 0.01) and for cheese in women (P-trend = 0.02)."

    http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/early/2015/04/01/ajcn.114.103010

    In the latest meta-analysis of saturated fat, trans fats, and disease, the highest vs lowest intake of trans fats found in dairy and ruminant fat was significantly associated with a greatly reduced risk of developing type 2 diabetes. (and there was no association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease).

    http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h3978

    And of course we have had an epidemic of type 2 diabetes since people have adopted the idea that low-fat dairy and lean meat are healthy.

    "Its a cutthroat world and people like to hear good things about their bad habits. It makes for easy book sales and increases animal product profits."

    The first part of this statement does explain some of the more sensationalist media reactions to the kind of science that we explore, for sure. But a book is a more thoughtful and time-consuming enterprise. If your idea were true, there would be a "Big Sweet Surprise – how Sugar, Cakes and Biscuits Belong in a Healthy Diet" on the best seller list, not a Big Fat Surprise.

    I don't resent Fonterra or Alliance their profits, because they sell food that nourishes people. Put their products into a nutrition calculator, and you'll see that they're worth the money. They can be part of a healthy diet. Can they also be part of an unhealthy diet? Absolutely. No food is a foolproof protection, but the less adulterated, ersatz, or refined the food, the better, and these days the sugar and starch and vegetable oil content of food is a pretty good guide to how far it's departed from being good for us.

    George

    1. Low carb diets increase all cause mortality. Here’s a study published in the Harvard journal looking at 130,000 people over 2 decades. Those who ate the most animals had a +31% increase risk of dying compared to those who ate the least. Finally they looked at low carb plant based diets and found that all cause mortality and death from cardiovascular disease where decreased in the plant eaters, showing that it was that saturated fat and cholesterol rich meat after all.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989112/

      Prevention and reversal of coronary atherosclerosis. No evidence of this occurring on an omnivorous diet.
      http://dresselstyn.com/JFP_06307_Article1.pdf

      The Inuits who are on a LCHF diet show worse rates of CVD then westerners. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25064579
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12535749
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8298320
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22968891

      Moving on to science paid for by the national dairy council
      You’ll see krauss RM is one of the researchers involved in this study who happens to receive funding from the national diary council and the national cattleman’s beef association.
      This 2010 meta-analysis was basically just repackaged for 2014, using the same and similar studies.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20071648

      “Chowdhury’s analysis was deeply flawed due to omission of important studies, extraction of incorrect data from some studies, incorrect interpretation of their own findings, and failure to mention results of other, superior analyses,” says Walter Willett, MD, DrPH, chair of the department of nutrition at Harvard School of Public Health, who recommended a retraction of the study. “The analysis missed the important benefits from both omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fats due to those problems, and therefore also missed the important benefits of replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated fats.”
      If you take a cross-section of the population, you can find no statistical correlation between saturated fat intake and cholesterol levels, because it’s not like everyone who eats a certain set amount of saturated fat is going to have over a certain cholesterol. Hence it’s an inappropriate design demonstrating or refuting the role of diet and coronary heart disease, that’s due to variability of baseline genetic cholesterol levels.
      The only study designs that are appropriate for determining heart disease risk are metabolic ward experiments or intervention studies as they calculate the change in cholesterol levels due to diet.
      http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/2014/03/19/dietary-fat-and-heart-disease-study-is-seriously-misleading/
      http://www.todaysdietitian.com/newarchives/111114p32.shtml
      https://www.cspinet.org/nah/pdfs/covermay2014.pdf
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/313701
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24723079

      1. I’m not sure you select the best available evidence here. Have a good look at this on the wider issues
        http://www.nutrition-coalition.org/the-issue/

        I agree the scince is not settled
        http://www.nutrition-coalition.org/what-experts-are-saying/

        This on SFA which seems to be the major sticking point\
        http://www.nutrition-coalition.org/saturated-fats-do-they-cause-heart-disease/

  14. P.S. James,

    here are some examples of the successful use of a vegan LCHF diet

    The effect of a plant-based low-carbohydrate (“Eco-Atkins”) diet on body weight and blood lipid concentrations in hyperlipidemic subjects. 2009

    METHODS:
    A total of 47 overweight hyperlipidemic men and women consumed either (1) a low-carbohydrate (26% of total calories), high-vegetable protein (31% from gluten, soy, nuts, fruit, vegetables, and cereals), and vegetable oil (43%) plant-based diet or (2) a high-carbohydrate lacto-ovo vegetarian diet (58% carbohydrate, 16% protein, and 25% fat) for 4 weeks each in a parallel study design. The study food was provided at 60% of calorie requirements.

    RESULTS:
    Of the 47 subjects, 44 (94%) (test, n = 22 [92%]; control, n = 22 [96%]) completed the study. Weight loss was similar for both diets (approximately 4.0 kg). However, reductions in LDL-C concentration and total cholesterol-HDL-C and apolipoprotein B-apolipoprotein AI ratios were greater for the low-carbohydrate compared with the high-carbohydrate diet (-8.1% [P = .002], -8.7% [P = .004], and -9.6% [P = .001], respectively). Reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also seen (-1.9% [P = .052] and -2.4% [P = .02], respectively).

    CONCLUSION:
    A low-carbohydrate plant-based diet has lipid-lowering advantages over a high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diet in improving heart disease risk factors not seen with conventional low-fat diets with animal products.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19506174

    Effect of a 6-month vegan low-carbohydrate (‘Eco-Atkins’) diet on cardiovascular risk factors and body weight in hyperlipidaemic adults: a randomised controlled trial (2014)

    Intervention: Participants were advised to consume either a low-carbohydrate vegan diet or a high-carbohydrate lacto-ovo vegetarian diet for 6 months after completing 1-month metabolic (all foods provided) versions of these diets. The prescribed macronutrient intakes for the low-carbohydrate and high-carbohydrate diets were: 26% and 58% of energy from carbohydrate, 31% and 16% from protein and 43% and 25% from fat, respectively.

    Primary outcome: Change in body weight.

    Results: 23 participants (50% test, 68% control) completed the 6-month ad libitum study. The approximate 4 kg weight loss on the metabolic study was increased to −6.9 kg on low-carbohydrate and −5.8 kg on high-carbohydrate 6-month ad libitum treatments (treatment difference (95% CI) −1.1 kg (−2.1 to 0.0), p=0.047). The relative LDL-C and triglyceride reductions were also greater on the low-carbohydrate treatment (treatment difference (95% CI) −0.49 mmol/L (−0.70 to −0.28), p<0.001 and −0.34 mmol/L (−0.57 to −0.11), p=0.005, respectively), as were the total cholesterol:HDL-C and apolipoprotein B:A1 ratios (−0.57 (−0.83, −0.32), p<0.001 and −0.05 (−0.09, −0.02), p=0.003, respectively).

    Conclusions: A self-selected low-carbohydrate vegan diet, containing increased protein and fat from gluten and soy products, nuts and vegetable oils, had lipid lowering advantages over a high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight loss diet, thus improving heart disease risk factors.

    http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/2/e003505.full

  15. […] se você acha que os EUA são estúpidos, veja as recentes diretrizes da Nova Zelândia para ver uma estupidez […]

  16. Thanks Grant. Found it fascinating learning more about this. Keep up the good work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Richard David Feinman

Richard Feinman, the Other

The Science of Human Potential

Understanding how to be the best you can be. Professor Grant Schofield.

helenkilding

A topnotch WordPress.com site

lowcarbshighfat.com

LCHF, Diet & Health

Eat...Enjoy

Eat real food. Enjoy real health.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,052 other followers

%d bloggers like this: